seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and apply Section 302, emphasizing the importance of a fair and just legal system. It truly is important for society to understand the gravity of this offense as well as need for stringent punishment to deter prospective offenders and make certain justice to the victims and their households.
Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are with the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally sound, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be subject to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case from the petitioners for promotion could possibly be regarded as, however, we have been distinct in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health and fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy subject on the approval on the competent authority.
record in the department there is not any record out there whatsoever regarding promotion of your petitioner(Promotion)
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal support is usually highly-priced and difficult to attain.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation includes the names of the parties to the first case, the court in which the case was heard, the date it absolutely was decided, and the book in which it is recorded. Different citation requirements could contain italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to adhere to.
Section 302 on the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject matter into the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.
When the petitioner is solely present within the place of incidence without causing any injury into the deceased or PWs then in these kinds of circumstances, click here whether he is vicariously liable shall be decided through the acquired trial Court after recording with the evidence.
The scrupulous reader may have noticed something previously mentioned: a flaw. Further than the first 7 words, the definition focuses over the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The 2 standard elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of a crime are “
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling to the same variety of case.
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to your healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are no specific provisions from the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental regulation in Pakistan, it's important that the case recognized the application from the precautionary principle where there is a threat to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations in the State in protecting the right into a clean and healthy environment.
competent authority has determined the eligibility from the private respondents and found them for being fit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)